Tears on the pillow
Sunday, August 27th, 2006It is not often that a good book makes me cry. The last time that happend was in 2002. And I'll save that book review for another day. Last night I almost became dehydrated due to Bob Greene's And You Know You Should Be Glad (2006). It is a true story of life-long friendship. It is a story about men in friendship. Wives across America should buy this book, justifying the purchase as a gift for the husband, but then they should curl up and read the book – alone. I say alone because the book is ultimately about companionship and how we experience intimacy with others. And in order to reflect and feel and face the fears that true intimacy reveals, we must be raw. Solitude is usually required to get to that place. And it is easier to cry alone than in the presence of someone that pesters you with "what is the book about?" and you become overwhelmed with trying to convey the depth of feeling articiulated in the book.
The book is also about death, the loss of a friend that takes with him or her part of our past. Death ultimately exposes what type of friendship you had experienced in the first place – one of utility? one of simple pleasure? Or, one of the highest things which Aristotle advocates in the Ethics.
According to one Aristotle scholar:
A friendship for pleasure comes into being when two people discover that they have common interest in an activity which they can pursue together. Their reciprocal participation in that activity results in greater pleasure for each than either could achieve by acting alone. Thus, for example, two people who enjoy playing tennis might derive pleasure from playing each other. Such a relationship lasts only so long as the pleasure continues.
A friendship grounded on utility, on the other hand, comes into being when two people can benefit in some way by engaging in coordinated activity. In this case, the focus is on what use the two can derive from each other, rather than on any enjoyment they might have. Thus, for example, one person might teach another to play tennis for a fee: the one benefits by learning and the other benefits financially; their relationship is based solely on the mutual utility. A relationship of this sort lasts only so long as its utility.
A friendship for the good, however, comes into being when two people engage in common activities solely for the sake of developing the overall goodness of the other. Here, neither pleasure nor utility are relevant, but the good is. Thus, for example, two people with heart disease might play tennis with each other for the sake of the exercise that contributes to the overall health of both. Since the good is never wholly realized, a friendship of this sort should, in principle, last forever.
According to me, no Aristotle scholar, we do not discuss friendship enough. Until a friend dies, that is. The fact that this book is written by a man and is about his male friends, makes the exposure of friendship in this book all the more poignant. In an age when men are often depicted as doormats, fools and beer-drinking sports fans — this book portrays men as caring and senstive creatures.
I recommend this book. Feel friendship.

